Back in August Google announced its intention to eventually include AMP pages within all organic mobile search results.
Game on! Yesterday Google officially confirmed the global rollout of AMP in mobile search results has started and should be completed by the end of the year.
Google’s lead product manager for AMP, Rudy Galfi, reiterated that AMP pages won’t get a special boost in mobile results from Google.
So if Google’s not offering a ranking boost as a carrot (as they did to encourage site-owners to make pages mobile-friendly), why should you care? More to the point, why invest time and money developing AMP versions of your website pages?
The short answer is speed.
Page load speed is critical — especially with mobile. According to a study by KissMetrics, 40% of people abandon a website that takes more than 3 seconds to load.
This is why Google favours AMP. When there are two versions of a page, Google will show the AMP version in its mobile search results. AMP pages load significantly faster than conventional web pages — typically in less than a second. And, as Google has pointed out, 90% of AMP publishers experience higher click-through and engagement rates.
While Google is not directly providing a ranking boost to encourage the adoption of AMP, there may be an indirect boost.
As we’ve previously pointed out, having a higher CTR than average can potentially result in Google improving the rank of search result listings because higher CTR indicates greater relevancy. So given AMP pages have higher CTR rates making an AMP version of your site may indirectly result in a rankings boost and subsequent increase in traffic and conversions.
Obviously, it depends on several factors beyond Google boosting rankings because of higher than average CTR.
First of all, will users recognise and show a preference to AMP listings in Google mobile search results, even if they are highlighted with a little lightening bolt icon? At this point, I’d be willing to bet if you ask 100 people if they know what AMP pages are you’ll get blank looks from at least 99.
Secondly, if there’s widespread adoption of AMP by publishers as there was with mobile-friendly pages, then any advantages in being an early adopter and having one of the few AMP results will eventually be negated.
Google is clearly committed to AMP, as evidenced by the Google Webmaster Blog which currently is full of articles and advice on how to implement AMP. I suspect Google is going to succeed and in time most listings showing up in Google mobile search results will be AMP pages.
Given this, it’s time to get off the fence and start preparing. And that’s something we’ll certainly be doing.
Click here for more search marketing news.
If you found this useful, please tell your friends.
Mark is a Partner and Senior Consultant at SureFire which he founded back in 2002. Prior to establishing SureFire he worked for KPMG Consulting. Today Mark heads up SEO, embracing the challenges that can come with complex website implementations. Outside of work, his interests beyond his family are running, snowsports, diving and fishing (badly).
Google Ads introduces ‘ad strength’ indicator & reporting for responsive search ads12 Aug, 2018
Running Google Display ads on mobile? Now you can’t stop them showing in mobile apps11 Dec, 2017
New-look Google dials up Search Relevance20 Nov, 2017
Use AdWords to reach Customers with Intent30 Oct, 2017
AdWords Gets a New Competitor05 Jun, 2017
Accelerated Mobile Pages – on reflection, maybe not such a great idea…21 Oct, 2016
AMPle reasons you should make the move to AMP19 Aug, 2016
AMP – early mover advantage and sceptics07 Aug, 2016
Google rolling AMP into mobile organic search results